Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Шоу: 20 | 50 | 100
Результаты 1 - 4 de 4
Фильтр
1.
J Breath Res ; 17(2)2023 02 16.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230329

Реферат

Early, rapid and non-invasive diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is needed for the prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19 mainly affects the respiratory tract and lungs. Therefore, analysis of exhaled breath could be an alternative scalable method for reliable SARS-CoV-2 screening. In the current study, an experimental protocol using an electronic-nose ('e-nose') for attempting to identify a specific respiratory imprint in COVID-19 patients was optimized. Thus the analytical performances of the Cyranose®, a commercial e-nose device, were characterized under various controlled conditions. In addition, the effect of various experimental conditions on its sensor array response was assessed, including relative humidity, sampling time and flow rate, aiming to select the optimal parameters. A statistical data analysis was applied to e-nose sensor response using common statistical analysis algorithms in an attempt to demonstrate the possibility to detect the presence of low concentrations of spiked acetone and nonanal in the breath samples of a healthy volunteer. Cyranose®reveals a possible detection of low concentrations of these two compounds, in particular of 25 ppm nonanal, a possible marker of SARS-CoV-2 in the breath.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Volatile Organic Compounds , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Breath Tests/methods , Electronic Nose , Biomarkers/analysis , Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis
2.
J Breath Res ; 16(3)2022 04 28.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1740724

Реферат

A Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test of a nasal swab is still the 'gold standard' for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, PCR testing could be usefully complemented by non-invasive, fast, reliable, cheap methods for detecting infected individuals in busy areas (e.g. airports and railway stations) or remote areas. Detection of the volatile, semivolatile and non-volatile compound signature of SARS-CoV-2 infection by trained sniffer dogs might meet these requirements. Previous studies have shown that well-trained dogs can detect SARS-CoV-2 in sweat, saliva and urine samples. The objective of the present study was to assess the performance of dogs trained to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in axillary-sweat-stained gauzes and on expired breath trapped in surgical masks. The samples were provided by individuals suffering from mild-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), asymptomatic individuals, and individuals vaccinated against COVID-19. Results: Seven trained dogs tested on 886 presentations of sweat samples from 241 subjects and detected SARS-CoV-2 with a diagnostic sensitivity (relative to the PCR test result) of 89.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.4%-92.2%) and a specificity of 83.9% (95% CI: 80.3%-87.0%)-even when people with a low viral load were included in the analysis. When considering the 207 presentations of sweat samples from vaccinated individuals, the sensitivity and specificity were respectively 85.7% (95% CI: 68.5%-94.3%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 80.2%-90.3%). The likelihood of a false-positive result was greater in the two weeks immediately after COVID-19 vaccination. Four of the seven dogs also tested on 262 presentations of mask samples from 98 subjects; the diagnostic sensitivity was 83.1% (95% CI: 73.2%-89.9%) and the specificity was 88.6% (95% CI: 83.3%-92.4%). There was no difference (McNemar's testP= 0.999) in the dogs' abilities to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in paired samples of sweat-stained gauzes vs surgical masks worn for only 10 min. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the promise of SARS-CoV-2 screening by detection dogs and broaden the method's scope to vaccinated individuals and easy-to-obtain face masks, and suggest that a 'dogs + confirmatory rapid antigen detection tests' screening strategy might be worth investigating.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Animals , Breath Tests , COVID-19 Vaccines , Dogs , Humans , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Sweat/chemistry , Working Dogs
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(16): 2265-2268, 2020 11 19.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1153158

Реферат

On human lung parenchymal explants, chloroquine concentration clinically achievable in the lung (100 µM) inhibited the lipopolysaccharide-induced release of TNF-ɑ (by 76%), IL-6 (by 68%), CCL2 (by 72%), and CCL3 (by 67%). Besides its antiviral activity, chloroquine might also mitigate the cytokine storm associated with severe pneumonia caused by coronaviruses.


Тема - темы
Chloroquine , Cytokines , Chloroquine/pharmacology , Humans , Lipopolysaccharides , Lung , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
4.
EBioMedicine ; 63: 103154, 2021 Jan.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-957021

Реферат

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is of the utmost importance but remains challenging. The objective of the current study was to characterize exhaled breath from mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we used real-time, online, proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry to perform a metabolomic analysis of expired air from adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit due to severe COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). FINDINGS: Between March 25th and June 25th, 2020, we included 40 patients with ARDS, of whom 28 had proven COVID-19. In a multivariate analysis, we identified a characteristic breathprint for COVID-19. We could differentiate between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS with accuracy of 93% (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 94%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0·94-0·98, after cross-validation). The four most prominent volatile compounds in COVID-19 patients were methylpent-2-enal, 2,4-octadiene 1-chloroheptane, and nonanal. INTERPRETATION: The real-time, non-invasive detection of methylpent-2-enal, 2,4-octadiene 1-chloroheptane, and nonanal in exhaled breath may identify ARDS patients with COVID-19. FUNDING: The study was funded by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (SoftwAiR, ANR-18-CE45-0017 and RHU4 RECORDS, Programme d'Investissements d'Avenir, ANR-18-RHUS-0004), Région Île de France (SESAME 2016), and Fondation Foch.


Тема - темы
COVID-19/pathology , Metabolomics/methods , Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis , Aged , Area Under Curve , Breath Tests , COVID-19/virology , Critical Illness , Discriminant Analysis , Female , Humans , Least-Squares Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Principal Component Analysis , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/pathology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Volatile Organic Compounds/metabolism
Критерии поиска